← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10024/2011dismissed as infructuous

A.Venkatramani, v. Nitin Kumar Dhirajlal Gokal,

2022-01-27Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.NOS.10024 TO 10032 OF 2011 A.Venkatramani

...Petitioner in all WPs

Vs 1.Nitin Kumar Dhirajlal Gokal, No.71-A, Atlas Apartment, J.Mehta Road, Mumbai 400 006.

2.The Metropolitan Magistrate First Class, 14th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai.

...Respondents in all WPs

PRAYER : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 2nd respondent relating to the complaint in C.C.Nos.500, 501, 502, 503, 669, 670, 738, 799/ss/2009 and 261/ss/2010 respectively pending on the file of the 2nd respondent, quashing the same and consequently, directing the 2nd respondent to return the complaint in the said case to the first respondent for presentation to the appropriate court having territorial jurisdiction to try and entertain the same. In all WPs:

For Petitioner :

Mr.V.Arunagiri For 1st Respondent :

Mr.Pushpamenon For 2nd Respondent :

Court COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent brought to the notice of this Court that the proceedings initiated before the Competent Court at Mumbai are going on. Thus, the cause arose for the purpose of filing the present writ petitions did not exist and thus, no further adjudication is required. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Consequently, these Writ Petitions stand disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar Sgl To The Metropolitan Magistrate First Class, 14th Court, Girgaon, Mumbai.

W.P.Nos.10024 to 10032 of 2011 BR(CO) RVM(09/02/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/