← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/70/2022granted

Umar Farook v. The State Rep By

2022-01-06Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.70 of 2022 1.Umar Farook 2.Zainulabhdin 3.Zakariya

...Petitioners

Versus

State By, The Inspector of Police G-1, Vepery Police Station Chennai (Crime No.830 of 2021)

...Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail on the event of their arrest in Crime No.830 of 2021, pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, G-1, Vepery police station, Chennai.

For Petitioners : Mr.I.Abdul Basith For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 451 and 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002 in Crime No. 830 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and assaulted him and caused injuries. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they are innocent and they have been falsely

implicated in this case. He further submitted that there is a case in counter and the first petitioner had lodged a complaint before the respondent police in Crime No.831 of 2021 against the defacto complainant. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and the investigation is almost completed. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the investigation is almost completed, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the II Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Monday and Thursday at 05.30 p.m. until further orders. (c) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 06/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE II METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE EGMORE, CHENNAI.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-1, VEPERY POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.I.ABDUL BASITH Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.459 CRL OP.70/2022 Date :06/01/2022 RW 12/01/2022