← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/14182/2013disposed of

M/S.Imatics Technologies Pvt v. M/S.Interlace India Pvt Ltd

2020-01-22Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.14182 of 2013 and MP.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 1.M/s Imatics Technologies Pvt Ltd, Rep. by its Autorised Signatory, Mr. Ramakrishnan.

2.Mr. Ramakrishnan Director, M/s Imatics Technologies Pvt Ltd.

3.Mr.Satheesh Kumar Kakamani, Director, M/s Imatics Technologies Pvt Ltd.

4.Mr.Legala Vijay Anand Reddy, Director, M/s Imatics Technologies Pvt Ltd.

... Petitioners /Accused Vs.

M/s Interlace India Pvt Ltd, Rep. By its Vice President, Mr.G.Ambalavanan.

... Respondent Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to call for the records pertaining to the case in C.C.No.736 of 2013 pending on the file of the Learned II Fast Track Judge, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.P.Palanichamy For Respondents : Mr.S.Suresh

ORDER

These criminal original petitions have been filed seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.736 of 2013 on the file of the Learned II Fast Track Judge, Egmore, Chennai and to quash the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial and complete the same as early as possible. He would further submit that the appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court may be dispensed with and would further submit that the petitioners are ready to appear as and when necessary arise.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the respondent concede to the request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

4.In view of the above, this Court directs the learned II Fast Track Judge, Egmore, Chennai, to expedite the trial in C.C.No.736 of 2013 and complete the same as early as possible. The appearance of the petitioners before the Trial Court is dispensed with. However, this order will not stand on the way of the Trial Court to insist for the appearance of the petitioners for receiving copies under Section 207 of Cr.P.C., framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and judgment and as and when the Trial Court feels it necessary. 5.With the above directions, this criminal original petition os disposed of.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CJ Conf) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jrs To 1.The II Fast Track Judge, Egmore, Chennai +1cc to Mr.S.Suresh, Advocate SR.No.4601 +1cc to Mr.C.P.Palanichamy, Advocate SR.No.4566 Crl.O.P.No.14182 of 2013 and MP.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 EV(CO) GMY(28/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/