← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/9022/2017granted

Vikki @ Vignesh Kumar, M/A-28 v. State Rep.By

2017-05-05Honourable Mr Justice P. Kalaiyarasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Fifth day of May Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. KALAIYARASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9022 of 2017 VIKKI @ VIGNESH KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIPERUMBUDUR POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

CR.NO.351 OF 2017.

For Petitioner : M/S.T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR. B. RAMESH BABU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294[b], 324, 506[ii] and 307 of IPC on the file of the respondent police in Crime No.351 of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 24.04.2017, due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner abused the de facto complainant filthily and attacked him.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in this case and the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is a permanent resident and therefore, he may be granted anticipatory bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side] though opposes this petition, concedes that injured has been discharged from the hospital. Except Section 506[ii] of IPC, other offences are bailable.

5. Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is having permanent residence and also the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. -sd/- 05/05/2017 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIPERUMBUDUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRIPERUMBUDUR POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT. +1CC to M/S.T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 8393 CRL OP.9022/2017 Date :05/05/2017 EGR 09/05/2017