Mr.L.Narasiman, v. Mrs.R.Jothilakshmi,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21-01-2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM A.S.No.199 of 2017 Mr.L.Narasimhan .. Appellant vs.

1.Mrs.R.Jothilakshmi 2.C.Rajesh .. Respondents Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Order 41, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree of the Learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras in O.S.No.1830 of 2016 dated 17.11.2016.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents :

Dr.C.Ravichandran [For R1 & R2]

JUDGMENT

The appeal suit was listed for hearing on 05.12.2019, none appeared for the appellant and the case was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 09.12.2019. On 09.12.2019 also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and again, it was posted under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 11.12.2019. On 11.12.2019, there was a representation on the ground that the appellant is ready to proceed with the appeal and accepting the request made on behalf of the appellant, the case was adjourned. Again the matter was listed on 09.01.2020, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and again, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 21.01.2020.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. When the matter is listed today, i.e., on 21.01.2020, none appeared for the appellant and this Court has to draw an inference that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the appeal suit in A.S.No.199 of 2017 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-) // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Kak To The VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.C.Ravichandran, Advocate, SR.No.4089. A.S.No.199 of 2017 RR(CO) CSR: 25.02.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/