P.Jayabharathi Rajan, v. The State,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of May Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. KALAIYARASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9026 of 2017 1 P.JAYABHARATHI RAJAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 P.JENITHA 3 A.SELVARANI 4 R.NITHYA Vs THE STATE, [ RESPONDENT ] REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAKONAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT-631 003.
CR.NO.NOT KNOWN/2017.
For Petitioner : M/S.L.MARGARET Advocate For Respondent : MR. B.RAMESH BABU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the first petitioner has not been arrayed as accused in the case. 2.Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this petition is dismissed with respect to the first petitioner as un-necessary.
3.With respect to the petitioners 2 to 4, they apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 355 and 323 of I.P.C., in Crime No.not known of 2017 on the file of the respondent police and hence, pray for anticipatory bail.
4.The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and therefore, they may be granted anticipatory bail.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that no one has been injured and he has no serious objection. 6.Considering the nature of the offences and the fact that the petitioners are having permanent residence and also the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 to 4, with certain conditions.
7.Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 4 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Arakonam and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police, once in a week i.e., on every Monday at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two months and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 8.The petitioners 2 to 4 shall appear before the concerned Judicial Magistrate within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
-sd/- 04/05/2017 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARAKONAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAKONAM POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT-631 003.
+2 CC to M/S.L.MARGARET Advocate on payment of necessary charges Sr.8265 CRL OP.9026/2017 Date :04/05/2017 rvr 05/05/2017