Vinothkumar@Vinothraj v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of January Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.94 of 2021 1 VINOTHKUMAR@VINOTHRAJ [ PETITIONERS ] 2 APPU@PRASANTH Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNERI POLICE STATION, PONNERI,TIRUVALUR DIST.

For Petitioner : M/S.R.DINESHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, Addl. Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 353 and 506 (ii) of IPC, in Crime No.309 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that a wordy quarrel arose between the defacto complainant and the petitioner, pursuant to which, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and also assaulted the defacto complainant and his wife and daughter. After receiving the said complaint, police went to the occurrence place and enquired about the complaint. At that time, the petitioners did not allow them to do their duty, in which, dispute arose between the police and the petitioner. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent person and no way connected with this crime and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have assaulted the defacto complainant, due to which, the defacto complainant sustained injuries and he would further submit that the petitioners have prevented the police to discharge their duties. Hence, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioners have involved in serious offences and the petitioners have prevented the police to discharge their duties, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

-sd/- 19/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNERI POLICE STATION, PONNERI,TIRUVALUR DIST.

2.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.R.DINESHKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.94/2021 Date :19/01/2021 KSM03/02/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/