N.V.Venkatesan @ Balaji v. N.D.N.Parthasarathy(Deceased)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011 & MP.Nos.1/2012 & 1/2013 1.N.V.Venkatesan 2.N.S.Ramgopal 3.Murali Rajagopalan .. Appellants in both Appeals Vs.

1.N.D.N.Parthasarathy [Deceased] 2.N.Sampath 3.N.Rajagopalan 4.D.Sundararajan 5.Preeth Parthasarathy 6.D.Senthil Kumar 7.S.Krishnamoorthy 8.V.V.Nagarajan 9.K.Velmurugan 10.M.Manoharan 11.Tmt.Mythili Sundar 12.Radha Parthasarathy 13.Priya Ramakrishnan .. Respondents in AS.No.333/2011

**RR2&3 brought on record as LRs of deceased 1st respondent viz., N.D.N.Parthasarathy vide Court order dated 17.10.2022 made in CMP.No.7369, 7371 & 7374/2021 in AS.Nos.334 & 333/2011 1.N.D.N.Parthasarathy 2.Mrs.Vasumathichari 3.Mrs.Radha Balaji 4.Mr.Sundararajan 5.Mrs.Chitra Sridharan 6.Mrs.Rama Sampath 7.Mrs.Malathi 8.Mrs.Mythili Sundar 9.Radha Parthasarathy 10.Priya Ramakrishnan 11.Preeth Parthasarathy ..

Respondents in AS.No.334/2011 Common Prayer:- Appeal Suits filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2011 made in OS.No.713/2004 & 369/2006 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore.

AS.No.333/2011:- For Appellants :

Mr.R.Agilesh For RR 2 to 4, 6 to 11 :

No appearance For R5 :

Mr.T.S.Baskaran For R12 :

Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For R13 :

Mr.C.Edsar Raj for M/s.Chennai Law Firm

AS.No.334/2011:- For Appellants :

Mr.R.Agilesh For RR 2 to 8 :

No appearance For R5 :

Mr.T.S.Baskaran For R9 :

Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For R10 :

Mr.C.Edsar Raj for M/s.Chennai Law Firm For R11 :

Mr.S.Kalyanaraman COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,] (1) Today, a Memo dated 23.03.2023 is filed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, on behalf of the appellants. (2) It is stated in the Memo that the parties had settled their dispute in the above First Appeals and the appellants have decided to withdraw the Appeal Suits. Learned counsel also referred to the letter dated 22.03.2023 addressed by the appellants to the learned counsel, based on which a letter has been sent by the learned counsel to the Registry requesting to post the above Appeal Suits for withdrawal.

(3) Learned counsel also made a submission that recording the Memo dated 23.03.2023, the Appeal Suits may be dismissed as withdrawn.

(4) Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants and the Memo dated 23.03.2023 filed on behalf of the appellants, these Appeal Suits are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [SSSRJ] [PBBJ] 30.03.2023 AP Internet : Yes To 1.The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore.

2.The Section Officer VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

S.S.SUNDAR, J., AND P.B.BALAJI, J., AP 30.03.2023