Kannan v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.120 of 2022 Kannan ... Petitioner Vs.
State: Rep. By ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, Sankarapuram Police Station, Kallakuruchi District.
Crime No.869/2021.
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner/accused on bail in Crime No. 869 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : M/s.M.Karthik For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.11.2021 for the offences under Sections 4(1)(A), 4(1)(a) of TNP Act, in Crime No.869 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is on 25.11.2021, during regular vehicle check up, the respondent police officials found the petitioner in possession of 15 liters of illicit arrack. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 40 days from 25.11.2021 and that the petitioner on his own volition ready to deposit a substantial amount to any charitable
institute as may be directed by this Court and would pray for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) vehemently opposed stating that the petitioner was found in possession of 15 liters of illicit arrack and the petitioner has got 4 previous cases but admits that the investigation is almost completed.
5. At this juncture, the learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that out of the 4 cases, 3 cases have already been disposed of and as of now, only one case is pending against the petitioner.
6. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner shall be directed to make a non refundable deposit of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only), to the credit of the Registered Advocate Clerks Association, Kallakuruchi, without prejudice to his rights and contentions. The amount so deposited shall be utilised by the Association for the welfare of the Advocates.
7. It is made clear that the deposit of the amount by the petitioner to the said Association would not amount to admission of guilt. The trial Court shall deal with the case independently on merits without reference to the amount deposited at the stage of bail.
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that investigation is almost completed and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. (a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing his own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), before the Superintendent of the concerned prison, in which the petitioner have been confined and thereafter on their release;
(b) the petitioner shall make non-refundable deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) through demand draft to the Registered Advocate Clerks Association, Kallakuruchi, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and on such deposit, the petitioner shall execute two sureties for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarapuram, within 15 days from the date of commencement of the Court's normal
functioning, failing which the bail granted by this Court shall stand dismissed automatically; (c) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;
(d) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.
(e) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature;
(f) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(g) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(h) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
(i) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
6.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
-sd/- 06/01/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARAPURAM, VILLUPURAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SANKARAPURAM POLICE STATION, KALLAKURUCHI DISTRICT.
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, CUDDALORE.
THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERKS ASSOCIATION, KALLAKURUCHI DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.M.KARTHIK, Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.120/2022 Date :06/01/2022 TA-07/01/2022