← Library
Madras High CourtCRL RC/22/2025allowed

Murugan v. The State By

2025-01-08Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Murugan ... Petitioner Vs.

STATE BY Inspector of Police, Tiruvalam Police Station, Vellore District.

Crime No.200 of 2024.

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order dated 11/12/2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi, Vellore District in CMP.No.3376/2024 in Crime No.200/2024 and direct to release the Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry bearing Registration Number TN-31-AB-3162 owned by the petitioner, by allowing this Criminal Revision Petition. For Petitioner :

Mr.D.Thirumoorthy For Respondent :

Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Page No.1 of 6

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the impugned order, dated 11.12.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.3376 of 2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi dismissing the petitioner's petition filed under Section 451 of Cr.P.C for return of vehicle viz., Ashok Leyland Tipper lorry bearing Reg.No.TN-31-AB-3162.

2.The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle which is said to have been used by the accused for commission of offence under Sections 379 & 430 of IPC in Crime No.200 of 2024 for transporting two units of river sand. The petitioner had sought for return of the vehicle stating that ever since the date of seizure i.e., on 11.06.2024, the vehicle is kept idle in an open place and exposed to sun and rain. The learned Magistrate dismissed the said petition on the ground that the petitioner is likely to commit similar offence; and that the vehicle is liable for confiscation.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the Page No.2 of 6

seizure was made on 11.06.2024, the confiscation proceedings is yet to be initiated; that the petitioner is innocent and there is no previous case against him; that the interim custody of the vehicle may be handed over to the petitioner since from the date of seizure, the vehicle is kept in an open space exposed to the vagaries of weather; that further retention of vehicles at the Police Station would make the vehicle unusable, and it would become a scrap; and that the petitioner is ready to comply with any condition that this Court may impose while granting return of vehicle. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions would submit that the petitioner has no previous case; and that no confiscation proceedings have been initiated so far.

5.In the light of the above submissions, this Court is of the view that the vehicle cannot be allowed to be kept idle in the Police Station subject to the vagaries of weather as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Since the petitioner is admittedly the owner of the vehicle, the interim custody of the vehicle can be handed over to the petitioner subject to the stringent conditions.

Page No.3 of 6

6.Accordingly, the impugned order, dated 11.12.2024 in Crl.M.P.No.3376 of 2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi is set aside. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi is directed to return the vehicle viz., Ashok Leyland Tipper Lorry bearing Reg.No.TN-31-AB3162 to the petitioner on the following conditions: (i)The petitioner shall execute a bond for sum of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi; (ii)The petitioner shall produce the original RC Book along with self attested photostat copy of RC Book of the vehicle and other relevant records to prove his ownership. The learned Magistrate shall peruse the RC book and other records, retain xerox copy of the same and return the original RC book to the petitioner;

(iii)The petitioner shall not alter or alienate the vehicle in any manner; (iv)The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will produce the vehicle as and when required by the respondent Police and by the Court below.

Page No.4 of 6

7.In the result, this criminal revision case stands allowed. It is made clear that the above return of vehicle is subject to the outcome of the confiscation proceedings if any initiated.

08.01.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vv2 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Katpadi.

2.The Inspector of Police, Tiruvalam Police Station, Vellore District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

vv2 Page No.5 of 6

08.01.2025 Page No.6 of 6