P.Navaladi v. The Inspector Fo Police

Crl.O.P.No.94 of 2021 Crl.O.P.No.94 of 2021 V.BHARATHIDASAN,J.

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 353 and 506 (ii) of IPC, in Crime No.309 of 2019, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that a wordy quarrel arose between the defacto complainant and the petitioner, pursuant to which, the petitioner abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and also assaulted the defacto complainant and his wife and daughter. After receiving the said complaint, police went to the occurrence place and enquired about the complaint. At that time, the petitioners did not allow them to do their duty, in which, dispute arose between the police and the petitioner. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent person and no way connected with this crime and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Crl.O.P.No.94 of 2021 V.BHARATHIDASAN,J.

ub 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioners have assaulted the defacto complainant, due to which, the defacto complainant sustained injuries and he would further submit that the petitioners have prevented the police to discharge their duties. Hence, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioners have involved in serious offences and the petitioners have prevented the police to discharge their duties, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 19.01.2021 ub Crl.O.P.No.94 of 2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/