← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/105/2021granted

Sarath Kumar v. The State Rep.By

2021-01-11Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.105 of 2021 1.Sarath Kumar 2.Rajesh 3.Surya .. Petitioners Vs.

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Koovathur Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

Crime No.985 of 2020 ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.985 of 2020, on the file of the Respondent police.

For petitioners : Mr.G.Mageshkumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 354, 324, and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.985 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to land dispute, the petitioners waylaid the de-facto complainant's son and brother-inlaw, abused and assaulted them with iron rod and thereby, both of them sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on the date of occurrence, the petitioners waylaid and assaulted the de-facto complainant's son and brother-in-law, due to which, both of them sustained injuries. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Heard both sides.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukazhukundram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which this petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix his photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 11/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUKAZHUKUNDRAM 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOOVATHUR POLICE STATION KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.G.MAGESH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.105/2021 Date :11/01/2021 RVR 29/01/2021