Steephanraj v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No. 10011 of 2016 P.KALAIYARASAN, J.

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-6 and A-7, were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.04.2016 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 352, 324 and 506(i) of IPC read with 3(1) of TNP (PD&L) Act, in Crime No.95 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners are alleged to have abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language, assaulted and threatened him with dire consequences and thereby caused injuries. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the coaccused / A3, A2 and A4, have been released on anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No. 9873 of 2016 dated 29.04.2016 and the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated as accused in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody for more than 20 days. 4.Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent has no serious objection.

P.KALAIYARASAN, J.

vsg/gya 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the duration of the custody and also co-accused were enlarged on anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] each with two sureties each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nagapattinam and on further condition that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of one month. 04.05.2016 vsg/gya Crl.O.P.No. 10011 of 2016