Pattu Iyer @ Rajagopala Iyer, v. Venkataraman,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.10.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.1444 of 1996 1.Pattu Iyer alias Rajagopala Iyer 2.Krishnamurthy Iyer .. Appellants /Vs/ 1.Venkataraman 2.Gowri Sankar 3.Devaki 4.Saroja 5.Shyamala 6.Bama 7.Sridhar .. Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.88 of 1994 dated 19.01.1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Myladuthurai, reversing the well considered decree and judgment dated 30.04.1994 in O.S.No.220/1984 on the file of the District Munsif, Sirkali.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : V.Bhiman for R1 to R7

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for hearing on 01.10.2018, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence the matter was adjourned to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 03.10.2018 i.e., today. Even today, when the matter is listed for hearing, there is no representation for the appellants.

2. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dna

To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Myladuthurai.

2.The District Munsif, Sirkali.

Copy to: The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+ 1 cc to M/s. V. Bhiman, Advocate Sr.68311 S.A.No.1444 of 1996 CP(CO) EU(17/10/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/