A.Palanivel, Aged 54 Years v. S.Deivanayagi, Aged About
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T. SELVAM Crl.A.No.248 of 2017 A.Palanivel S/o.B.Arumugam ..Appellant Vs.
S.Deivanayagi W/o.R.Sakthivel ..Respondent Criminal Appeal filed u/s.378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of learned Judicial Magistrate III, Salem, passed in C.C.No.11 of 2014 on 08.12.2016.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Thangavel *****
JUDGMENT
This appeal arises against the judgment of learned Judicial Magistrate III, Salem, passed in C.C.No.11 of 2014 on 08.12.2016. http://www.judis.nic.in
C.T.SELVAM, J gm
2. Heard learned counsel for appellant, who brings to notice that the present appeal is before this Court pursuant to leave therefor having been granted.
In keeping with the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in S.Ganapathy v. Senthil Vel [2016 (4) CTC 119], appellant has to prefer an appeal before the District Court. The Criminal Appeal shall stand dismissed. Of course, in seeking condonation of delay, if any, in preferring such appeal, it is open to the appellant to explain the delay.
28.04.2017 Index:yes/no Internet:yes gm To The Judicial Magistrate III, Salem.
Crl.A.No.248 of 2017 http://www.judis.nic.in