A.Ravindharan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
Crl.O.P.No. 1 0 0 2 2 of 2 0 1 6 P.KA LAIYARA S A N, J.
The petitioner, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.238 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and seeks anticipatory bail. 2 . The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant and the petitioner and the other co-accused attacked the defacto complainant and caused injury. 3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit the the coaccused has been granted bail and the defacto complainant has sustained only simple injury.
4.
The learned Additional Public Prosecutor concedes that the defacto complainant has sustained only simple injury and he has no serious objection.
P.KALAIYARA S A N, J.
bbr/srn 5 . Considering the release of the co-accused on bail, the facts that the petitioner is having permanent residence and that the defacto complainant has sustained only simple injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tirupathur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
7.
The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of three weeks from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. bbr/srn 04.05.2016
Crl.O.P.No. 1 0 0 2 2 of 2 0 1 6