Rathina Naicker v. Singara Naicker
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.A.No.966 of 1996 Rathina Naicker .. Appellant
Versus
1.Singara Naicker 2.Arumuga Naicker 3.Kannappa Naicker .. Respondents PRAYER:Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.04.1991 in A.S.No.43 of 1988 before the Sub-Court, Kancheepuram, preferred against the judgment and decree dated 07.07.1987 in O.S.No.271 of 1979 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Kancheepuram.
For Appellant ::
----
ORDER
The Registry had, as directed issued notice to the appellant by R.P.A.D. It is stated that the notice had been returned as 'Door Locked. It is clear that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. This Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nvi To
1. The District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram.
2. The Sub-Court, Kancheepuram Copy To:
The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
S.A.No.966 of 1996 RGN(CO) CSL/26.02.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/