Dinesh Kumar v. The State Rep By Its,

Crl.M.P.No.1263 of 2023 in Crl.A.(SR) No.509 of 2023 (Filing No.) M.SUNDAR, J., and M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) Mr.G.Suganthi, learned counsel representing Mr.A.Abdul Lathif, counsel on record for petitioner is before us.

2. Captioned Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed with a 'Condonation of Delay' ['COD'] prayer.

3. COD sought is qua 421 days delay in filing a regular appeal assailing judgment in Spl.C.C.No.5 of 2017 on the file of Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Coimbatore being judgment dated 16.09.2019.

4. Adverting to the support affidavit, learned counsel representing the counsel on record submits that the financial status and the attendant difficulties faced by the appeal in this regard has caused the delay.

5. We have considered the facts and circumstances of the case and we are of the view that the reason can be accepted in the case on hand owing to the facts and circumstances of the case on hand. Page Nos.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.SUNDAR, J., and M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J., gpa COD prayer acceded to. Captioned Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered as prayer for i.e., delay condoned. There shall be no order as to costs.

[M.S.J.,] [M.N.K.J.,] 02.02.2023 gpa Crl.M.P.No.1263 of 2023 in Crl.A.(SR) No.509 of 2023 (Filing No.) Page Nos.2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis