E. Veeramani v. The Inspector General Of Registration

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P No.1562 of 2025 E.Veeramani

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Inspector General Of Registration No 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 2.The District Registrar Chengalpattu District 3.The Nova House Owners Association Represented By Its President Mahindra World City, Chengapattu District ....Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to dissolve the NOVA House Owners Association (NHOA) as defunct, which functioning illegally from 2017 onwards, in virtue of the show cause notice issued by 2nd respondent through his proceedings in Na.Ka. No 4474 / E1 / 2024 dated 19.12.2024 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to register the new NAWA association in online Application No. S01SREGVV202407048003544, pending before the District Registrar, Chengalpattu. For Petitioner : Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondents : M.C.Sathish for R1 and R2 1/4

Government Advocate

O R D E R

The writ petition is filed seeking a direction to 2nd respondent to dissolve the NOVA House Owners Association (NHOA) which has been functioning illegally from the year 2017.

2. It is seen from the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition and the typed set of papers that earlier, the petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction to 2nd respondent to consider his representation dated 09.07.2024 to dissolve the defunct association which was functioning illegally. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order dated 06.08.2024 directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass final orders on its' own merits after affording opportunity to 3rd respondent association. It is stated by the petitioner that the said order has not been complied. Therefore, a contempt petition has been moved before this Court in Cont.P.No.4006 of 2024 against the 2nd respondent. The said contempt petition was closed by recording the statement made by the counsel representing the respondent therein that order under contempt had been complied with by proceedings dated 19.12.2024.

2/4

3. Now, the petitioner has come before this Court by stating that proceedings dated 19.12.2024 was only a show cause notice issued to the 3rd respondent by 2nd respondent pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in the earlier writ petition and no final order has been passed. Therefore, the earlier order has not been complied with.

4. If the earlier order passed by this Court has not been complied with by the 2nd respondent, it is not open to the petitioner to file another writ petition seeking very same direction. If the earlier order is not complied with, it is for the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law by filing appropriate application seeking clarification of the order dated 20.12.2024. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. 24.01.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order : Yes/No nr 3/4

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

nr To 1.The Inspector General Of Registration No 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 2.The District Registrar Chengalpattu District W.P No.1562 of 2025 24.01.2025 4/4