← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9156/2017dismissed

Dr.Lakshmipriya v. The Government Of

2017-07-04Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 04.07.2017 Coram :

The Honourable Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.9156 to 9159 of 2017 & W.M.P.Nos.10077 to 10084 of 2017

1. Dr.Lakshmipriya

...Petitioner in

W.P.No.9156 of 2017

2. Dr.M.Kumutha

...Petitioner in

W.P.No.9157 of 2017

3. S.Tamilarasi

...Petitioner in

W.P.No.9158 of 2017

4. Dr.M.Dineshkumar

...Petitioner in

W.P.No.9159 of 2017 Vs

1. The Government of Tamilnadu Rep.by its Secretary, To the Government, Personnel and Administrative Reform Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.

2. The Vice-Chancellor Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore-641 046.

3. Bharathiar University Rep by The Registrar-In-Charge, Coimbatore-641 046.

4. University Grants Commission Rep by Its Secretary, Bhadur Shaw Zafar Marg, New Delhi.

5. M.Muniasamy

6. B.Rajkumar

7. J.Manivannan

8. R.Rajkumar

9. B.Sathiyapriya

...Respondents in all W.P.'s

COMMON PRAYER: PETITIONS filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for records of 3rd respondent's Advt.No.F7/2016/15072-5 dated 14.07.2016 and quash the same. For Petitioners :Mr.G.Rajan (in all WPs) For Respondents :Mr.K.Dhanajeyan (in all WPs) Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.R.Ravichandran for Mr.C.Amilthan for R2 and R3 COMMON ORDER By consent, writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. These writ petitions are filed challenging the recruitment notification issued by the third respondent on 14.07.2016 vide Advt.No.F7/2016/15072-5.

Though certain allegations has been raised in these writ petitions, the writ petitioners have not produced any document to show that illegalities were crept in, in the process of recruitment.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioners the learned Special Government Pleader for the first respondent and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 and 3 contended that pursuant to the notification, the selection process were proceeded with, and 9 candidates were appointed in the post. Therefore, if there is any irregularity in the process of selection, it is left open to the writ petitioner to challenge the appointment orders, if he chooses to do so. The other grounds raised in the writ petitions and the prayer, as such sought for in these writ petitions deserve no further consideration or adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petitions stand dismissed. However no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VIII) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar

To

1. The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu To the Government, Personnel and Administrative Reform Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.

2. The Vice-Chancellor Bharathiyar University, Coimbatore-641 046.

3. The Registrar-In-Charge, Bharathiar University Coimbatore-641 046.

4. The Secretary, University Grants Commission Bhadur Shaw Zafar Marg, New Delhi.

+4cc to Mr.C.Amilthan,Advocate sr.46374,46375,46372,46373 +1cc to Mr.G.Rajan,Advocate sr.46522 +1cc to Government Pleader sr.46880 W.P.Nos.9156 to 9159 of 2017 nm1(co) ss(3/8/2017)