M.Kanniyappan v. State Rep.By Its

CRL. O.P. No.10164 of 2015 R.SUBBIAH, J.

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 420 IPC., and seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainants are the sisters of the accused/petitioners. The petitioners have obtained a Legal Heir Certificate, excluding the defacto complainants and sold the property, in which, there was a civil suit in O.S.No.54 of 2015, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Vellore, for partition and recovery of 1/5th share in the compensation amount of Rs.9,68,660/-, is pending against the petitioners and the said suit was lateron transferred to the file of the Additional District Judge, Ranipet and the same is pending.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that it is only a false case foisted against the petitioners and they are no way connected with the alleged offence.

R.SUBBIAH, J.

skm

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but imposing stringent conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Magistrate concerned within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Vellore, or to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Vellore, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required.

30.04.2015 skm CRL. O.P. No.10164 of 2015