Srinivasan, v. Bakthavatchalam,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Ninth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT THE HON`BLE MRS JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA CMP.No.610 of 2011 IN SA.382 of 2003 SRINIVASAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs BAKTHAVATCHALAM [ RESPONDENT ] Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 1776 days in filing petition to restore the CMP No.16502 in CMP.SR.No.20430/2005 in SA No.382/2003 [in CMP.No.610 of 2011].

Order : This petition coming on this day for hearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Petitioner not appearing either in person or by an advocate, the court made the following order:- When this petition was taken up for hearing on 08.09.2021, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Registry was directed to post the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 09.09.2021. Even today, i.e., 09.09.2021 there is no representation for the petitioner.

2. In view of the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for default.

-sd/- 09/09/2021 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, POONAMALLEE 2 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, POONAMALLEE Order in CMP.No.610 of 2011 IN SA.382 of 2003 Date :09/09/2021 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format RA 16/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/