G. Venkatesan v. The Regional Transport

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 16.04.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.NO.10870 OF 2012 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2012 G.Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs.

The Regional Transport Officer, Coimbatore (South), Coimbatore.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other order or Writ directing the respondent to issue Annual Tax Token in respect of the car bearing Reg. No.PY-01-BL-1122 by receiving the prescribed amount under the Act.

For petitioner :

Mr.R.Subramanian For respondent :

Mr.D.Suryanarayanan Gov.Advocate

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petition is now become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the writ petition.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mst https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Regional Transport Officer, Coimbatore (South), Coimbatore.

+1cc to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, S.R.No.23640 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.23380 W.P.No.10870 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 PCH(CO) CS/23/06/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/