Madras High CourtCONT P/520/2023closed

Olympia Infratech v. H.Prakash Rao And 5 Others

2023-12-14Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.12.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Olympia Infratech A Unit of Olympia Tech Park (Chennai) Pvt Ltd having a registered office at 1, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy Chennai - 600 032 Rep by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Sampath Kumar .. Petitioner

Versus

1.H.Prakash Rao President - OOOA Amber - 06B2, Olympia Opaline No.33, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Navalur Chennai - 600 130 2.Y.Sundarakandan Vice President - OOOA Amber - 16F2 Olympia Opaline No.33, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Navalur Chennai - 600 130 3.S.Karthikeyan, Secretary - OOOA Jade-19B, Olympia Opaline No.33, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Navalur Chennai - 600 130 4.B.Ilango, Joint Secretary - OOOA Garnet-6D, Olympia Opaline No.33, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Navalur Chennai - 600 130 1/4

5.Raghuraman, Treasurer - OOOA Garnet-17E, Olympia Opaline No.33, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Navalur Chennai - 600 130 6.Shanthi Tharun Kumar, Joint Treasurer - OOOA Amethyst - 03C, Olympia Opaline No.33, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Navalur Chennai - 600 130 .. Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this court dated 27.07.2020 in C.M.A.No.1188 of 2020.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.V.V.N.Sivanthy for M/s.Fox Mandal and Associates For Respondents :

Mr.Nithyaesh Nataraj for Mr.Vaibhav R.Venkatesh

ORDER

This contempt petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order of this court dated 27.07.2020 in C.M.A.No.1188 of 2020.

2. It is relevant to note that this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal itself is filed as against the interim order passed by the learned Arbitrator, wherein, certain undertaking was given by the petitioner herein. Hence, this Court disposed of this 2/4

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Now, it appears that the entire arbitral proceedings has culminated into an Award. Such being the position, it is for the petitioner to execute the award passed in their favour in the manner known to law.

3. Accordingly, I am not inclined to incline to entertain this contempt petition based on the interim order passed by the learned Arbitrator. Hence, this contempt petition stands closed. No costs.

14.12.2023 Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No dhk 3/4

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

dhk 14.12.2023 4/4