V.Senthil Kumar v. The Commissioner

in W.P.No.251 of 2023 M.SUNDAR, J., This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP'].

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of original of 'two demand notices dated 12.11.2022 and 31.12.2022 respectively bearing Property Tax Assessment No.093/028/900246 corresponding Old Assessment No.093/27434' [hereinafter 'first impugned notice', 'second impugned notice' respectively and 'impugned notices' collectively for the sake of convenience and clarity]

3. Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner adverting to the support affidavit submitted that the respondent Corporation had only served the computerized copy (meaning soft copy) of the impugned property tax demand notices and therefore, the petitioners are constrained to file the Page Nos.1/3

dispense with petition. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to Paragraph No.6 of the support affidavit, which reads as follows: '6 .............................The Respondent corporation had only served the computerized copy of the impugned property tax demand notices and therefore, the petitioners are constrained to file the dispense with petition.'

5. The above reason qua dispense with prayer in captioned WMP is acceptable.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. 06.01.2023 (2/3) mk Page Nos.2/3

M.SUNDAR, J., mk in W.P.No.251 of 2023 06.01.2023 (2/3) Page Nos.3/3