← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30000/2017disposed of

Masthan v. The Inspector General Of

2017-11-22Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.30000 of 2017 Mr.Masthan S/o.Yusuf ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration O/o. The Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.

2.The Sub Registrar Sriperumbudur Sub-Registration Office Sriperumbudur Taluk Kanchipuram District - 600 105.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to immediately return the original document of the registered cancellation deed of Power of Attorney in Document No.03167 of 2017 (vide receipt No.201724049) dated 20.07.2017 to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.10.2017 within time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abdul Basith For Respondents: Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Mr.K.J.Sivakumar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the second respondent to return the original document of the registered cancellation deed of Power of Attorney in Document No.03167 of 2017 dated 20.07.2017.

3. Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. It is seen that the petitioner has presented a document viz., cancellation deed of Power of Attorney dated 20.07.2017, for registration before the second respondent. It is further seen that though such document was assigned with a document No.03167 of 2017, also by issuing a receipt No.201724049, the second respondent has not returned the document to the petitioner so far. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.10.2017, for return of the document.

5. The grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent has not considered the representation so far. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the second respondent to consider and decide the same. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.10.2017 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. -s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar mk To 1.The Inspector General of Registration O/o. The Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.

2.The Sub Registrar Sriperumbudur Sub-Registration Office Sriperumbudur Taluk Kanchipuram District - 600 105.

+1 CC to Mr.I. Abdul Basith, Advocate sr 83183. W.P.No.30000 of 2017 SP(24/11/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/