G.Sridharan, v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 5.6.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.A.No.1044 of 2018 G.Sridharan Appellant
Versus
1 The State of Tamilnadu rep by its Secretary to Government Finance Department Fort St George Chennai- 600 009.
2 The Director Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Panagal Maaligai Saidapet Chennai- 600 015.
3 The District Collector Sivagangai District at Sivagangai.
4 The Commissioner Small Savings Department (The then Tamil Nadu Raffles Department) Annasalai Chennai-600 002.
5 The Personal Assistant (Development) O/o. The District Collector Sivagangai District.
Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 15.3.2018 passed in W.P.No.5865 of 2018 on the file of this court.
W.P.No.5865 of 2018:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India,to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioners statutory appeal dated 23.09.2017 and thereby direct 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service since 13.06.2014 and pay back all service benefits to him within a stipulated period.
For appellant : Mr.A.Rajesh Kanna For respondents: Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram Special Government Pleader
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the court was made by HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. The writ appeal has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in dismissing the writ petition which sought for a direction to dispose of the appellant's Statutory Appeal dated 23.9.2017.
3. It is the case of the appellant that he being Office Assistant in the second respondent-Department, had availed unearned medical leave on 14.6.2014 and on recovery of his illness, he tried to join duty on 18.8.2014, but, he was not allowed to join duty and subsequently, a disciplinary proceedings was initiated against him which ended in his compulsory retirement and challenging the same, the appellant had filed a Statutory Appeal. Having found that the Statutory Appeal was not disposed of by the authority concerned, he had come up with the writ petition.
4. In view of the limited scope of the claim made by the appellant, we feel that ends of justice would be met if a direction is given to the second respondent to expedite the disposal of the Statutory Appeal, in modification of the order passed by the learned Single Judge and accordingly, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the Statutory Appeal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. All the contentions on the issue are left open to be urged before the appellate authority. The writ appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar ssk.
To:
1 The Secretary to Government Finance Department Fort St George Chennai- 600 009.
2 The Director Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Panagal Maaligai Saidapet Chennai- 600 015.
3 The District Collector Sivagangai District at Sivagangai.
4 The Commissioner Small Savings Department (The then Tamil Nadu Raffles Department) Annasalai Chennai-600 002.
5 The Personal Assistant (Development) O/o. The District Collector Sivagangai District.
+1 CC to Mr.A. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate sr 34749. +1 CC to Spl. Govt. Pleader sr 35348.
W.A.No.1044 of 2018 SVN(CO) SP(28/06/2018)