← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/185/2026granted

Panchalingam v. State Rep By Its, The Inspector Of Police,

2026-01-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Panchilingam ... Petitioner Vs.

State By, Represented by The Inspector of Police, Annamalai Police Station, Coimbatore District.

Crime No.686 of 2025.

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.686 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Mohan For Respondent :

M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.686 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 23.12.205, due to previous enmity, petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with knife, due to which, defacto complainant sustained grievous injuries. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the nature of allegations and the submissions made on both sides and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital,

this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., for a period of

two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 08.01.2026 sma

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi.

2.The Inspector of Police, Annamalai Police Station, Coimbatore District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

sma 08.01.2026