← Library
Madras High CourtCS/372/1999dismissed for default

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi v. Paulthai Shanmuga Sundaram

2025-10-13Honourable Dr.Justice R.N.Manjula2 pages

C.S.No.372 of 1999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.10.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA C.S.No.372 of 1999 Mrs. C. Mangala Vijayalakshmi ... Plaintiff -vs1. Mrs.Paulthai Shanmuga Sundaram

2. K.S.Mothilal

3. K.S.Damodharan

4. K.S.Anantharaman ... Defendants Prayer : Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 & 2 of the High Court O.S. Rules Read With Order VII Rule 1 of the CPC, praying for the following judgment and decree against the defendants:

(a) For partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in the schedule mentioned properties;

(b) For ascertainment of mesne profits for the period from 3 years prior to the filing of the suit, till the delivery of separate possession of her 1/5th share, and pay her 1/5th share of the said mesne profits. (c) for costs.

DR.R.N.MANJULA,J.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.372 of 1999 Kj For Plaintiff : No appearance For Defendants : No appearance

JUDGMENT

There is no representation for the plaintiff. Defendants 1 & 2 are reported to have died, but no steps have been taken by the plaintiff and no memo was filed to record their death. No representation for defendants 3 & 4 as well. There is no purpose in keeping the suit pending as there is no representation for the plaintiff, despite the matter has been listed under the caption "for dismissal". Hence, the suit is dismissed for default. No costs. 13.10.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No kj C.S.No.372 of 1999 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis