Mrs. Renuka Devi v. Meenakshisundaram

A.No.2658 of 2013 A.No.2658 of 2013 in O.P.No.529 of 2012 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J., The learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. However, heard the learned counsel for the respondent/petitioner in O.P.No.529 of 2012.

2. O.P.No.529 of 2012 had been filed seeking probate of a Will dated 10.06.1996 executed by Nagarathinam Ammal, who died on 20.06.1997.

3. In the petition it had been stated that the petitioner and the respondent are the only surviving class-II legal heirs of Nagarathinam Ammal. However the present application has been filed by a third party seeking to implead himself as the 12th respondent.

4. To determine as to whether he could be categorized as a person having caveatable interest, the learned counsel was requested to file genealogy table.

5. It is seen that the petitioner in Application No.2658/2012, G.Meenakshisundaram is actually a son of Ganesan. The other respondents 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.No.2658 of 2013 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J., ssi are also class-II legal heirs. Naturally, the present applicant has to be impleaded as a further respondent in the Original Petition.

6. In view of the said relationship, the application stands allowed. 30.11.2022 (1/2) ssi A.No.2658 of 2013 in O.P.No.529 of 2012 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis