The Central Bank Of India v. 1.G.Nagarajan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.06.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A.No. 1125 of 1998 and CMP.No. 11008 of 1998 The Central Bank of India, Represented by its Regional Manager, Madras Region, Madras - 600002, Mount Road, Madras - 600002.

... Appellant/Appellant/1st Defendant

Versus

1. G.Nagarajan, Employed as Clerk, Central Bank of India, Washermanpet Branch, Madras - 600021.

2. Central Bank of India, Central Office, Bombay, Represented by its Chairman, Central Office, Bombay.

... Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiff and D-2 Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.12.1993 made in A.S.No.270 of 1992 on the file of the Court of the VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.04.1991 made in O.S.No. 10621 of 1990 on the file of the Court of the IV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras. For Appellant : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents: No appearance

J U D G M E N T

Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant stated that the suit has been filed by the respondent-G.Nagarajan via permanent injunction, restraining the Bank from taking any action on his community certificate produced by him at the time of the appointment and not to terminate his service and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

declaration, as sought for in this suit has been granted by the Trial Court and an appeal confirmed. Hence, the Central Bank of India has preferred this appeal.

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the Bank submitted that pending disposal of the above second appeal, the contesting respondent viz., the plaintiff was permitted to retire from service and all the terminal benefits has also been settled and the matter has become infructuous.

3. Taking note of the subsequent development, as submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Bank, I am of the view that with the above instructions there is no need to go into the issue and accordingly, this appeal has been dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sni To

1. The VI Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Madras

2. The IV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras.

3. The Registrar, City Civil Court, Madras.

Copy to The Section Officer,VR Section, High Court, Chennai.

S.A.No.1125 of 1998 ppa(co) nr 18/09/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/