← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1453/2026dismissed

Chandrasekar v. The State Rep. By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police,

2026-01-29Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1453 of 2026 Chandrasekar S/o.Palani ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, Katpadi Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No.382 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in Crime No.382 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. Sriraam M.S.

For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act, 2023, and r/w 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and 1/4

Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.382 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.

The earlier criminal original petition in Crl.O.P.No.27813 of 2025 seeking anticipatory bail has been disposed of by this Court by an order dated 13.10.2025 on the following reasons: "6.Considering the fact that huge quantity of the river sand has been transported by the petitioner, and cause damage to river bed and ecology, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner." 3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the anticipatory bail to the petitioner reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that still the case is under investigation.

4.

Heard the submissions made on both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, gravity of offence, the fact that there is no change in the circumstances, this Court is 2/4

not inclined to revisit the earlier order.

6.

Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 29.01.2026 ssa To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Katpadi Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No.382 of 2025)

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

ssa Crl.O.P. No.1453 of 2026 29.01.2026 4/4