Madras High CourtSA/1212/1998dismissed for default

Sarasammal v. Murugasamy And 4 Others

2019-07-10Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A.No.1212 of 1998 Sarasammal ... Appellant

Versus

1.Murugasamy 2.Palanisamy 3.Kaliyammal 4.Lakshmi (died) 5.Tmt.Mani 6.K.Subramanian 7.K.S.Bhaskaran ... Respondents [ R6 & R7 brought on record as LR's of the deceased R4, vide order dated.05.06.2013 made in CMP.Nos.221 to 223 of 2012] This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree dated 17.10.1995 in A.S.No.49 of 1993 on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court, Tirupur by confirming the Judgment and decree dated 22.09.1993 passed in O.S.No.292 of 1985 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tirupur.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents: M/s.Alvanes Irwin Aaroon (for R1 & R2) : Mr.M.Easan (for R6 & R7)

JUDGMENT

When the Second Appeal was listed on 27.06.2019 for reporting settlement, there was no representation on both sides. Hence, this Court directed the registry to list the Second Appeal today (i.e., 10.07.2019) under caption 'for dismissal'. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Today, when the appeal is called, no representation on behalf of the appellant and it was reported by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the dispute between the parties has been settled. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as default.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar klt To 1.The Subordinate Judge's Court, Tirupur.

2.The District Munsif Court, Tirupur.

3.The V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1212 of 1998 VSN II(CO) GMY(07/08/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/