← Library
Madras High CourtWMP/2005/2017ordered

The Management, v. The Presiding Officer,

2017-02-09Honourable Mr Justice T.Raja2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Ninth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE T.RAJA WMP No.2005 of 2017 IN WP.13051/2016 1 THE MANAGEMENT, [ PETITIONER ] TAMILNADU STATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION PALLAVAN SALAI, CHENNAI-600 002 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Vs 1 THE PRESIDING OFFICER, [ RESPONDENT ] LABOUR COURT, SALEM 2 A.ARUMUGAM, S/O.ANDI, ADIDRARIDAR STREET, SERUGUKUDI POST, MUCHURI TALUK, TRICHY 3 THE BRANCH MANAGER, SALEM CORPORATION, TAMILNADU STATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SALEM 4 DISTRICT EMPLOYEMNT OFFICER, EMPLOYEEMENT OFFICE, TRICHY Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Extent the Time period for the compliance of the order passed in WMP No.11393 of 2016 in WP No.

13051 of 2016 dated 06.04.2016 Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.PARAMASIVA DOSS, Advocate for the petitioner and of NOT APPEARING either in person or by an advocate for the respondent court made the following order:- This petition has been filed by the Management, Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation, Chennai, seeking extension of time to comply with the order, dated 06.04.2016 passed by this Court in W.M.P.No.11393 of 2016 in W.P.No.13051 of 2016.

2. This Court, by order, dated 06.04.2016 has granted an order of interim stay of the Award of reinstatement, subject to the condition that the petitioner Management deposits the entire back wages awarded by the

Labour Court in the impugned order within a period of eight weeks.

3. Citing some administrative reasons, the Transport Corporation has come to this Court seeking extension of time to deposit the entire amount.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has sought four weeks time to comply with the earlier order. But this Court grants two weeks time only.

5. In view of the above, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner Management to comply with the earlier order, dated 06.04.2016. With the above observations, this petition is ordered. -sd/- 09/02/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, SALEM 2 THE BRANCH MANAGER, SALEM CORPORATION, TAMILNADU STATE EXPRESS TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SALEM 3 DISTRICT EMPLOYEMNT OFFICER, EMPLOYEEMENT OFFICE, TRICHY C.C. to M/S.P.PARAMASIVA DOSS ADVOCATE Order in WMP.2005/2017 in WP.13051/2016 Date :09/02/2017 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format DG(20/02/2017)