Rajaram v. Navaneetham Srinivasan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM A.S.No.462 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 1.Rajaram 2.Ayyasamy 3.Selvarajan 4.Mangayakarasi 5.Chezhiyan ... Appellants Vs.

Navaneetham Srinivasan ... Respondent Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree of the Learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.II), Tindivanam in O.S.No.4 of 2004 (Tindivanam Sub Court O.S.No.58/02) dated 28.02.2007.

For Appellants : M/s.J.Prithivi For M/s.Kaithamalai Kumaran For Respondent : No appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants made a submission that in spite of the efforts taken by him, he was unable to secure instructions from the appellants for the purpose of proceeding with the case.

2. Thus, the learned counsel for the appellants reported no instructions before this Court. Consequently, the appeal suit stands closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Kak https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

To 1.The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.II), Tindivanam.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

A.S.No.462 of 2008 SVI(CO) RSI(20/05/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2