Petitioner v. Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.02.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.S.A.No.33 of 2000 Mr.Chakkarpani ... Appellant Vs.

1.Thaiyanayagi 2.Sakunthala 3.Rukumani 4.Radha 5.Susila 6.Dhanalakshmi 7.Govindasamy 8.Duraikannan 9.Manickam 10.Thangaraj 11.Gopalan

12. Perumal 13.Ganapathy 14.Subramanian 15.Veerappan 16.Rajammbal 17.Shanmugam 18.Santha 19.Rani 20.Vijayalakshmi .. Respondents https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Order 21 Rule 103 r/w u/s 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, Pondicherry in A.S.No.102 of 2000 dated 29.09.2000 in confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in E.A.No.12 of 2000 in E.P.No.166 of 1987 in O.S.No.804 of 1986 by the I Additional District Munsif, Pondicherry.

For Appellant : Mr.V.Raghavachari For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for RR1 to 6 NA for R7 & R14 RR8 to 13 and RR16 to 20 - not claimed R15-died

J U D G M E N T

The judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.102 of 2000 dated 29.09.2000 in confirming the fair and decreetal order passed in E.A.No.12 of 2000 in E.P.No.166 of 1987 in O.S.No.804 of 1986, is under challenge in the present civil miscellaneous second appeal.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant made a submission that the issues between the parties has already been settled out of Court.

3. In view of such submission, no further adjudication needs to be entertained with reference to the grounds raised in the present civil miscellaneous second appeal. Accordingly C.M.S.A.No.33 of 2000 stands closed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gsk To 1.The Principal District Judge, Pondicherry.

2.The I Additional District Munsif, Pondicherry.

+1cc to M/s.V.Raghavachari, Advocate SR.5729 C.M.S.A.No.33 of 2000 GP(CO) CB(01/03/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/