Mohansundari v. Ramadass

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 28.09.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Tmt.JUSTICE S. RAMATHILAGAM C.M.A.No.1378 of 2005

1. Mohanasundari

2. United India Insurance Company Limited, Namakkal.

Rep. by Branch Manager ...Appellants/1st and 2nd Respondent

Versus

Ramadass

...Respondent/Petitioner

Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.03.2004 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.31 of 2001 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Judge), Tiruvarur. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance

JUDGMENT

On a perusal of the notes paper, it is observed that, on 07.03.2017, the learned counsel for the appellants was not ready. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 22.03.2017, under the caption 'for dismissal'. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.03.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lpp https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Judge), Tiruvarur.

Copy to:

The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

C.M.A.No.1378 of 2005 PPA(CO) rrs 28/11/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/