Satish Kumar v. Sri Gnanambal Transport

C.M.P.No.9147 of 2024 in C.M.A.Sr.No.1800 of 2024 N.ANAND VENKATESH , J Notice has been served on the second respondent and the second respondent is represented through a counsel.

2. The first respondent remained ex parte before the Tribunal and therefore, notice to first respondent is dispensed with.

3. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 92 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records.

5. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 92 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

Registry is directed to number the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.R.Ravichandran, learned counsel for second respondent at the time of admission.

05.07.2024 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis