← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/1058/2017dismissed as infructuous

Sumathi, Aged 40 Years, v. State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By ,

2017-08-17Honourable Mr Justice P. Kalaiyarasan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 17.08.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.1058 of 2017 Sumathi .. Petitioner Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The Commissioner of Police, The Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-7.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, to call for the records relating to the detention order No.296/BCDFGISSSV/2017 dated 24.05.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioner's son Vinoth @ Vinoth Kumar, aged 23 years, S/o.Kumar, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon'ble Court and set the petitioner's son Vinoth @ Vinoth Kumar, aged 23 years, S/o.Kumar the detenu herein at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Muthukumar For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records relating to the detention order passed in No.296/BCDFGISSSV/2017 dated 24.05.2017 by the Detaining Authority against the detenue by name, Vinoth @ Vinoth Kumar, aged 23 years, S/o.Kumar, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

residing at No.72, 6th Street, Annai Sivagami Nagar, Ennore, Chennai-57 and quash the same.

2. It is represented on the side of the respondents that the Detention Order in question has already been revoked, by virtue of G.O.Rt.No.3231 dated 03.07.2017 and a copy of the same is submitted, wherein, it is clearly stated that the Detention Order in question has been revoked.

3. Considering the above said factual circumstances, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous.

4. In fine, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CO) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar gya To 1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The Commissioner of Police, The Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-7.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

4.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal.

5.The Joint Secretary to Government, Public (Law & Order) Fort St.George, Chennai-9 H.C.P.No.1058 of 2017 NR 07/09/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/