Sekar v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 11.02.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN Sekar ... Petitioner /vs/ State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Valathy Police Station, Villupuram District.

(Crime No.1495 of 2020) ... Respondent PRYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.1495 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For petitioner : Mr. R.Parthiban For respondent : Mr. S.Karthikeyan, Addl.P.P.

1/4

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) This matter is taken up for hearing under the caption "For Being Mentioned" today at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in paragraph 6 of the order in Crl.O.P.No.217 of 2021, though the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- it has been wrongly typed in words as "Rupees Fifty Thousand" instead of "Rupees Ten Thousand".

3. Considering the above submission, paragraph No.6 of the order is ordered to be read as follows:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) as nonrefundable deposit through RTGS/NEFT in favour of "'The Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerk Association, Indian Bank High Court Branch', A/C.No.484026006, IFSC Code. No.IDIB000M157, and on such payment and production of proof of deposit of the above amount, he shall be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within 2/4

a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, Gingee, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the police officer who intends to arrest, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed automatically, and on further conditions that:-"

4. The other conditions remain unaltered.

5. Registry is directed to incorporate above correction in the Order of this Court in Cr.O.P.No.217 of 2021 dated 11.01.2021 and issue fresh order copy to the petitioner.

6. Time is extended for further two weeks for executing sureties, from the date of receipt of a copy of the amended Order. 11.02.2021 mrp Note : Issue order copy today 3/4

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.

mrp 11.02.2021 4/4