← Library
Madras High CourtWA/1047/2013withdrawn dismissed

Ponnaiyah Ramajayam v. The All India Council For

2019-11-20Honourable Dr Justice Vineet Kothari,Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.A.Nos.1047 to 1049 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 (3 cases) Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Science & Technology, (PRIST University), rep. by its Chancellor, Administrative Office, 147, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. Appellant W.A.1047 & 1049/2013 Sri Ponnaiyah Ramajaya Thammal Educational and Charitable Trust (SPRTEC Trust), rep. by its Managign Trustee, Administrative Office, 147, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006.

Appellant in W.A.1048/2013

Versus

1. The All India Council for Technical Education, rep. by its Member Secretary, Chandralok Building, Janapath, New Delhi 110 002.

2. The Regional Officer, All India Council for Technical Education, The Southern Regional Office Shastri Bhavan, 26 Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006.

3. The Director of Town and Country Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents in all WAs

Prayer: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.4.2013 in W.P.Nos.9410, 9411 and 9412 of 2013 passed by this court.

Prayer in WP.No.9410 of 2013: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents 1 bearing F. No. Southern/2013/11380037821 LOR dt 7.3.13 Letter of Rejection and followed by SAC Appeal dt 13.3.13 and quash the said impugned proceedings and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to process the pending application dt 31.12.12 within a time frame and thereafter the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the application of the petitioner for approval submitted on 22.12.12 by conducting an inspection of their campus at Thenampadugai Revenue Village Keelappalayar Panchayat Tanjore District and consider the same and pass appropriate orders granting approval for the engineering faculty of the petitioner University. Prayer in WP.No.

9411 of 2013: Writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of crtiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents 1 bearing F.No.Southern/2013/11402561932 LOR dt 7.3.13 Letter of Rejection and followed by SAC Appeal dt 13.3.13 and quash the said impugned proceedings and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to process the pending application dt 31.12.12 within a time frame and thereafter the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the application of the petitioner for approval for shifting of their Polytechnic College submitted on 3.1.

13 by conducting an inspection of their campus at Assur Revenue Village and Panchayat Tanjore District and consider the same and pass appropriate orders granting approval for the shifting of the petitioner Polytechnic College to the Applied new site at Assur Revenue Village in Kumbakonam for the academic year 2013-2014.

Prayer in WP.No.9412 of 2013: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents 1 bearing F. No.Southern/2013/11372792091 LOR dt 7.3.13 Letter of Rejection and quash the said impugned proceedings and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to process the pending application dt 17.1.13 within a time frame and thereafter the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the application of the petitioner for approval submitted on 24.12.12 by conducting an inspection of their campus at Nullur Village Thirukazhikundram Taluk Kancheepuram District and consider the same and pass appropriate orders granting approval for the engineering faculty of the petitioner University.

For Appellant : Mr.S.P.Sudalaiyandi For R1 & R2 : No appearance.

For R3 :Mrs.A.Srijayanthi,Special Govt. Pleader COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the court was made by Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J.) Learned counsel for the Appellants prays for leave of the court to withdraw the present Appeals and has made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. The same has not been opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the other side. Accordingly, the Writ Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssk.

To:

1. The All India Council for Technical Education, rep. by its Member Secretary, Chandralok Building, Janapath, New Delhi 110 002.

2. The Regional Officer, All India Council for Technical Education, The Southern Regional Office Shastri Bhavan, 26 Haddows Road, Chennai 600 006.

3. The Director of Town and Country Planning, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

W.A.Nos.1047 to 1049 of 2013 AK(CO) CB(06/01/2020)