K.Sanjay v. State By Its, Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-01-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR K.Sanjay Petitioner(s) Vs State by its, Inspector of Police Sholingur Police station, Sholingur, Ranipet district. Cr.No.not known of 2025.
Respondent(s) PRAYER This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in cr.No.not known of 2025 on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioner(s):
M/s.K G Senthil Kumar For Respondent(s):
Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of BNSS in connection with the Cr.No.Not Known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The allegations against the petitioner is that on the date of alleged occurrence, while the defacto complainant's daughter playing with a purse containing 8 grams of gold coin and a sum of Rs.10,000/- in the street, the petitioner along with two other accused, stole the said items. Hence, the case.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, and he has been falsely implicated in this case by the respondent police and ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and on instructions, submitted that the respondent police recovered the stolen things, no previous case is pending against the petitioner and the investigation in this case is still pending and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, the stolen property were recovered, the petitioner has no previous case
pending against him and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sholingur, Ranipet district, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am., for a period two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
[c] the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned
Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023.
09-01-2026 jai To 1.Inspector of Police Sholingur Police station, Sholingur, Ranipet district.
2. The Judicial Magistrate, Sholingur.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
K.RAJASEKAR J.
jai 09-01-2026