← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/330/2023granted

Kuppa @ Ramkumar @ Tattoo Kuppan v. State Rep.By

2023-01-09Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi5 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c ), 20 (b) (ii) (B) of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic substances Act, 1985 in Cr.No.949 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on receipt of secret information, the respondent police proceeded to the concerned spot along with measuring instrument. The respondent police found that the petitioner/A3 along with two accused persons sold Ganja. The respondent seized the same and weighed the quantity and they found 1.3 Kgs of Ganja. Therefore, A1 was arrested and A2 & A3 ran away from the spot. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicatied in this case. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the 1/5

petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner along with two accused persons have sold 1.3 Kgs of Ganja. Hence, he opposed to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to contribute some amount for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned XVI, M.M. George Town, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand 2/5

dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the Sri Arunodayam Charitable Trust, 45, Sivananda Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai 600 099, A/c.No.50100196910687, Bank : HDFC Bank, Branch : Dayalur Nagar, Villivakkam Branch,IFSC Code : HDFC0004224, Cell No.918608971037, Tel 91-44-2651 1450, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below. [b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of twelve weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. 3/5

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

vsn [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

09.01.2023 vsn 4/5

5/5