Aruldoss, Aged 39 Years, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Crl.O.P.No.8102 of 2017 Aruldass .. Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police The District Police Office, Salem District, Salem.

2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Salem, Salem District.

3. The Inspector of Police Kolathur Police Station, Salem District.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, directing the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner and his family members.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthilkumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that the enquiry has already been completed by the respondent police and hence the presence of the petitioner is no more required for interrogation. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Recording the above statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jer To

1. The Superintendent of Police The District Police Office, Salem District, Salem.

2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Salem, Salem District.

3. The Inspector of Police Kolathur Police Station, Salem District.

4. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104.

+1cc to Mr.M.Senthil Kumar, Advocate Sr. 41443 Crl.O.P.No.8102 of 2017 VR(22/06/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/