C.Sekar v. Minor Sobika

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., During morning mentioning time, a representation was made that, in A.S.No.53 of 2012, the Learned Single Judge had disposed of the Appeal on 12.12.2019 and the Judgment as well as in the decree passed by the Learned trial Judge was confirmed regarding the share of the first Plaintiff in item No.1 of the property as 2/9 share. Regarding the second item of the property, the Judgment and decree of the Learned trial Judge was reversed in the appeal. Therefore, the Appeal was partly allowed.

2. It is the submission of the Learned Counsel for the Respondents that, in Paragraph No.15 & 22, instead of the share of the first Plaintiff, it was mentioned as Plaintiff in common. Therefore, the Judgment as well as the decree to be amended accordingly. The Learned Counsel for the Appellant surrendered the certified copy of the Judgment to enable the Registry to carry out the amendment.

3. The Registry is directed to carry out the amendment and issue fresh copy of the judgment and decree.

29.08.2022 dna 1/2

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP , J., dna 29.08.2022 2/2

3/2