Senthil Kumar v. State Through
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.
The Petitioner/A1 herein seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.513 of 2023 registered by the Respondent Police for the offences under Sections 365 and 342 IPC.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner stated that the Petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in Crime No.513 of 2023 registered by the Respondent Police for the offences under Sections 365 and 342 IPC. Thus, he seeks anticipatory bail to the Petitioners.
3. It is stated by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that all the Accused had entered into a contract with the defacto complainant to put up CCTV camera. The CCTV camera was actually put up. However, the defacto complainant was due and payable for a sum of Rs.50,00,000/-. For collecting the money the Accused are alleged to have kidnapped him and threatened him for payment.
1/4
4. It is to be mentioned that this Court had considered the anticipatory bail application of the Accused A2 and A3 in Crl.O.P.No.24828 of 2023 by an order dated 07.11.2023 and had also granted the same.
5. Taking all the factors into consideration, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. IV at Vellore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
2/4
[b] the petitioner shall report before the Respondent Police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for the interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
22.01.2024 mkn2 3/4
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.
mkn2 22.01.2024 4/4