Rangadoss v. Murugesan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.11.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN C.M.A.No.2893 of 2007 (Through Video Conferencing) Rangadoss ... Appellant Vs.
1.Murugesan 2.The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Officer, Karur.
... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree in M.C.O.P.No.927 of 2004, dated 31.01.2007, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents:
For R1 : No appearance For R2 : Mr.Y.T.Aravind Gosh Additional Government Pleader (CS)
JUDGMENT
There was no representation on behalf of the appellant, despite the case is being listed and conducted through video conferencing on 07.08.2020, 15.10.2020, 04.11.2020, 18.11.2020. After lifting the lock down also there was no representation for the appellant. Even today i.e., 20.11.2020, there is no representation.
2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, this civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for the present with a liberty to restore the same. No cost.
-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To:
The Additional Subordinate Judge Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem.
Copy to The Section Officer VR Section High Court, Madras 104.
+1 CC to The Additional Government Pleader sr 37594. C.M.A.No.2893 of 2007 EV(CO) SP(05/01/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/