← Library
Madras High CourtWA/118/2013dismissed as infructuous

Faculty Welfare Assn, Titi, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2018-11-09Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh,Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.11.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Writ Appeal No.118 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013 Faculty Welfare Association TTTI, Chennai Bearing Reg. No.403/2011 Rep. By its President, Dr.Dhanasekaran, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training Institute, Tharamani, Chennai - 113.

...

Appellant Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Commercial Taxes & Registration (M1) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 28.

3.The District Registrar, South Chennai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

4.The Director, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training Institute, Tharamani, Chennai - 113.

5.The Board of Governors Rep. By its Chairman, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research, Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Tharamani, Chennai - 113.

...

Respondents

Prayer:- Writ Appeal has been filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order in W.P.No.24728 of 2012 dated 11.09.2012.

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari Calling for the records relating to the order of the first respondent made in G.O.Ms.No.111 Commercial Taxes and Registration (M1) Department dated 10.8.2012 and the consequential proceedings of the 4th respondent dated 30.8.2012 calling for meeting of the Board of Governors and the Annual General Meeting on 13.9.2012 to quash the same.

For Appellant :

Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents 1 to 3 :

Mr.C.Kathirvelu Special Government Pleader For 4th Respondent :

Mr.Mohan For 5th Respondent :

Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan, SCGSC

JUDGMENT

(Judgement of the Court was delivered by M.M.Sundresh.J) When the matter came up for hearing toady, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the relief sought for in this writ appeal has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the relief sought for in this writ appeal is no longer survives. Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jbm

To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Commercial Taxes & Registration (M1) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 28.

3.The District Registrar, South Chennai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.

4.The Director, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training Institute, Tharamani, Chennai - 113. 5.The Board of Governors Rep. By its Chairman, National Institute of Technical Teachers Training & Research, Government of India, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Tharamani, Chennai - 113 W.A.No.118 of 2013 AD(CO) GN(10/12/2018)