← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2583/2025dismissed as infructuous

D.Dhanalakshmi v. The Director General Of Prisons

2025-09-22Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.09.2025 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.No.2898 of 2025 W.P.No.2583 of 2025 D.Dhanalakshmi ... Petitioner -vsPrison Department, Gandhi Irwin Road, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent in Ref.No.5001/Can.2/2024 dated 08.12.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to transfer the petitioners husband Dhanasekaran @ EnnorDhanasekaran PID No.196746 from Central Prison, Coimbatore to Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Addl. Public Prosecutor W.P.No.3988 of 2025 and Correctional Services, ... Petitioners -vs1. The Assistant Registrar, The State Human Rights Commission, Tamil Nadu, Chennai-28.

2. Mrs.C.Karupayee ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 05.11.2024 passed by the 1st respondent made in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in SHRC Case No.11009/22/13 of 2022.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran Spl. Govt. Pleader For R1 : Mr.David Sundar Singh For R2 : Mr.A.Saranraj *****

O R D E R

(By J.Nisha Banu,J.) When these matters are taken up for hearing, it is represented by the respective counsel appearing for the accused that the relief sought 2/4

for in these petitions, viz., transfer of the accused from one prison to another, has become infructuous, as the accused in both cases have already been released on bail and therefore, the petitions may be closed as infructuous. The said submissions have been endorsed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the learned Special Government Pleader, who appear for the State.

2. In view of the above submissions, we are of the view that nothing survives for further adjudication in these matters. Hence, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

(J.N.B.J.,) (S.S,J.,) 22.09.2025 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ar 3/4

J.NISHA BANU, J.

AND S.SOUNTHAR , J.

ar To:

Prison Department, Gandhi Irwin Road,

3. The Assistant Registrar, The State Human Rights Commission, Tamil Nadu, Chennai-28.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

22.09.2025 4/4