Subashini v. Sathmeeganambal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.12.2019 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M.SUNDRESH and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY A.S.No.759 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 1.Subashini 2.Subash 3.Selvaraj .. Appellants Vs 1.Sathmeegamnambal 2.Kuzhandaivalli 3.Navaneetham 4.Madana Gopal 5.Ragunandhan 6.Parimala 7.Kannan 8.Vasantha .. Respondents (Respondents 6 to 8 remained exparte in lower court. Hence, notice may be dispensed with.) Appeal preferred under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2008 made in O.S.No.8 of 2007 on the file of the Principal district Judge, Villupuram.
For Appellants ..
Mr.N.Suresh For Respondents..
Mr.Kaithamalai Kumaran for R3 to R5 No Appearance for R1 & R2 R6 to R8 exparte
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants seek permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. He has also filed a memo to that effect.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. In such view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rst To The Principal District Judge, Villupuram.
+1cc to Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran, Advocate, S.R.No.106758 A.S.No.759 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 PM(CO) GN(05/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/